Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Effects of defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth on masticatory function in post‐maxillectomy patients

Identifieur interne : 000C75 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000C74; suivant : 000C76

Effects of defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth on masticatory function in post‐maxillectomy patients

Auteurs : S. Koyama ; K. Sasaki ; T. Inai ; M. Watanabe [Japon]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:19FED6328A9E38D96D02978A21D4F82CC2254881

English descriptors

Abstract

summary  The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the masticatory function and the maxillary defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth in post‐maxillectomy patients restored with an obturator prosthesis. Fifty consecutive post‐maxillectomy patients (mean age 67·0) participated in this study. The subjects consisted of 26 dentate and 24 edentulous patients. Data were collected from the patients’ clinical records, diagnostic casts, and a questionnaire on masticatory function to evaluate the defect configuration, size, and the masticatory function scores associated with wearing obturator prostheses. The defect size was evaluated by the ratio of defect area to the horizontal impression area. The defect configuration was assessed according to Aramany's classification and separated into unilateral and bilateral defects. The multiple regression analysis and the Mann–Whitney U‐test (P < 0·05) were used to assess statistical significance. The Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank test was also used to detect correlation. The following conclusions were made: (i) The presence of teeth in the maxillary dentition and the different type of the defect configuration had significant correlation with the masticatory function score (r = 0·616). (ii) The masticatory function scores of the subjects differed significantly with the presence of teeth in the maxillary dentition and the different types of defect configurations (P = 0·005, P = 0·002, respectively). (iii) There was significant correlation between the masticatory function score and the size of the defect area in the edentulous group (r = −0·648, P = 0·001). The presence of teeth, the size and configuration of the defect influenced the masticatory function of post‐maxillectomy patients with obturator prostheses.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01483.x

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:19FED6328A9E38D96D02978A21D4F82CC2254881

Curation

No country items

S. Koyama
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Maxillofacial Prosthetics Clinic, Tohoku University Hospital</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Hospital</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
K. Sasaki
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Sendai</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
T. Inai
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Sendai</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Effects of defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth on masticatory function in post‐maxillectomy patients</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Koyama, S" sort="Koyama, S" uniqKey="Koyama S" first="S." last="Koyama">S. Koyama</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Maxillofacial Prosthetics Clinic, Tohoku University Hospital</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Hospital</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sasaki, K" sort="Sasaki, K" uniqKey="Sasaki K" first="K." last="Sasaki">K. Sasaki</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Sendai</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Inai, T" sort="Inai, T" uniqKey="Inai T" first="T." last="Inai">T. Inai</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Sendai</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Watanabe, M" sort="Watanabe, M" uniqKey="Watanabe M" first="M." last="Watanabe">M. Watanabe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Division of Aging and Geriatric Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Japon</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Division of Aging and Geriatric Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:19FED6328A9E38D96D02978A21D4F82CC2254881</idno>
<date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01483.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/19FED6328A9E38D96D02978A21D4F82CC2254881/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C75</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C75</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000C75</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Effects of defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth on masticatory function in post‐maxillectomy patients</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Koyama, S" sort="Koyama, S" uniqKey="Koyama S" first="S." last="Koyama">S. Koyama</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Maxillofacial Prosthetics Clinic, Tohoku University Hospital</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Hospital</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sasaki, K" sort="Sasaki, K" uniqKey="Sasaki K" first="K." last="Sasaki">K. Sasaki</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Sendai</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Inai, T" sort="Inai, T" uniqKey="Inai T" first="T." last="Inai">T. Inai</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Sendai</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Watanabe, M" sort="Watanabe, M" uniqKey="Watanabe M" first="M." last="Watanabe">M. Watanabe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Division of Aging and Geriatric Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Japon</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Division of Aging and Geriatric Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">32</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="635">635</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="641">641</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2005-09">2005-09</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment teeth</term>
<term>Bilateral defect</term>
<term>Bilateral defects</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Defect</term>
<term>Defect area</term>
<term>Defect size</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentate</term>
<term>Dentate group</term>
<term>Dentate patients</term>
<term>Dentition</term>
<term>Different type</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous group</term>
<term>Edentulous maxillectomy patients</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Impression area</term>
<term>Masticate</term>
<term>Masticatory</term>
<term>Masticatory function</term>
<term>Masticatory function score</term>
<term>Masticatory function scores</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary defect size</term>
<term>Maxillary dentition</term>
<term>Maxillectomy</term>
<term>Maxillectomy patients</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial prosthetics</term>
<term>Obturator</term>
<term>Obturator prostheses</term>
<term>Obturator prosthesis</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Residual</term>
<term>Residual maxillary area</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Tohoku university graduate school</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment teeth</term>
<term>Bilateral defect</term>
<term>Bilateral defects</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Defect</term>
<term>Defect area</term>
<term>Defect size</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentate</term>
<term>Dentate group</term>
<term>Dentate patients</term>
<term>Dentition</term>
<term>Different type</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous group</term>
<term>Edentulous maxillectomy patients</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Impression area</term>
<term>Masticate</term>
<term>Masticatory</term>
<term>Masticatory function</term>
<term>Masticatory function score</term>
<term>Masticatory function scores</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary defect size</term>
<term>Maxillary dentition</term>
<term>Maxillectomy</term>
<term>Maxillectomy patients</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial prosthetics</term>
<term>Obturator</term>
<term>Obturator prostheses</term>
<term>Obturator prosthesis</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Residual</term>
<term>Residual maxillary area</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Tohoku university graduate school</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">summary  The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the masticatory function and the maxillary defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth in post‐maxillectomy patients restored with an obturator prosthesis. Fifty consecutive post‐maxillectomy patients (mean age 67·0) participated in this study. The subjects consisted of 26 dentate and 24 edentulous patients. Data were collected from the patients’ clinical records, diagnostic casts, and a questionnaire on masticatory function to evaluate the defect configuration, size, and the masticatory function scores associated with wearing obturator prostheses. The defect size was evaluated by the ratio of defect area to the horizontal impression area. The defect configuration was assessed according to Aramany's classification and separated into unilateral and bilateral defects. The multiple regression analysis and the Mann–Whitney U‐test (P < 0·05) were used to assess statistical significance. The Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank test was also used to detect correlation. The following conclusions were made: (i) The presence of teeth in the maxillary dentition and the different type of the defect configuration had significant correlation with the masticatory function score (r = 0·616). (ii) The masticatory function scores of the subjects differed significantly with the presence of teeth in the maxillary dentition and the different types of defect configurations (P = 0·005, P = 0·002, respectively). (iii) There was significant correlation between the masticatory function score and the size of the defect area in the edentulous group (r = −0·648, P = 0·001). The presence of teeth, the size and configuration of the defect influenced the masticatory function of post‐maxillectomy patients with obturator prostheses.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C75 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000C75 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:19FED6328A9E38D96D02978A21D4F82CC2254881
   |texte=   Effects of defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth on masticatory function in post‐maxillectomy patients
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022